Hundred Watt FilmsWatch PC 666 in Comedy | View More Free Videos Online at Veoh.com
Watch PC 666 in Comedy | View More Free Videos Online at Veoh.com
Watch PC 666 in Comedy | View More Free Videos Online at Veoh.com
From April 26th 2009
I would like to make a prediction. Note the date: November 22 2008.
The big box store Home Depot reported that it lost 24% in the 2nd quarter. (although they were expecting to lose more, so it's all right) With the housing market down and the public afraid of the economy's future, folks aren't building extra rooms, back yard decks, let alone whole houses right now. One of the ways the Depot wants to remedy this problem is to put more sales people out on the floor.
I want to start a business. What do I need first? My new business will thrive if I provide something everyone wants and needs. This product should be a renewable. The public should have a need to replenish their supply on a regular basis as with soap or paper towels. If I can also provide a service to the community but not limit my business to a ‘service only’ company, then I will really have “it”. Next I can add nation wide, no, world wide distribution and my company is on its way.
Now my new company is open and everyone loves my product. I am opening new outlets monthly. I have covered cost and am making about 10% profit on an ongoing basis. I am able to hire more and more people and even put some of the money into research and development to refine my product and stay ahead of the competition.
I am very well established now and I decide to go public. A few years later and I am even paying dividends to my shareholders. The stock keeps on going up.
It seems like the perfect business plan, but I discover the one flaw of my plan. I don’t control the wholesale side and although the price I pay for my product is relatively steady I am noticing that the price is going down. My product is easy to get. Everyone is selling it and the public doesn't seem to need it as much right now. In order to stay competitive I can’t raise my profit margin above 10% to offset the lull, so I’m not making as much money overall. This year the dividends to the stockholders disappeared altogether and the stock price has hit an all time low. Without as much operating capitol I had to lay off some really good people, especially in the R&D department. I felt it was more important to keep the day to day operation going and not have to go to the bank or the government for a bail out.
Its years later and things have turned around. Between the average rate of inflation and the wholesale price creeping back up I’m doing well again. The general public is beginning to use my product more and more. There is healthy business in complementary products that enhance my sales. I still sell my product at a 10% profit, but with the wholesale price higher and simply selling more I now have more money. The shareholders are happy, the R&D department is buzzing again. I was able to hire more employees and even give out some raises.
Because I have had a couple of record years, Congress has decided to investigate my business practices. I am supposedly making too much money. What is too much money? Congress wants to increase the tax I already pay. Where’s the incentive to do well if you get punished when you do. They’re changing the rules after the game has started. In what other industry does this ever happen?
In case you haven’t figured it out, it’s an oil company. Re-read the piece as if it’s a sandwich shop, a cleaners, or even Wal-Mart and then reassess your opinion of a Windfall Profit Tax.
Hillary and Barack constantly go after each other about each other's experience and McCain admits that economics is not his best game. With two short term Democratic Senators and one long in the tooth Republican how will we Americans know that we're getting what we pay for...I mean vote for?
Why not have them take a test. An “SAT for presidents” kind of test. Shouldn't our Presidential candidates be up to the same snuff we place on lesser jobs and activities? We have a test for teachers, pilots, drivers, massage therapist and court reporters to name a few. All important jobs, yes, but for the top job there’s no top test. You can’t even buy air to breathe underwater without a card to prove you passed your SCUBA test. If you fail or lie about that you might die, but at least you won’t drown the rest of the country along
with you.
Think of all the presidents the United States would have been spared if we had this simple quiz….I’ll wait…When I hire a plumber I want him to know more than I do about replacing the elbow section of a kitchen sink and I want my President to know where Bhutan is, that there are two Dakotas and why we fought WWI. Is it so bad that along with diplomacy, compassion and charisma to also want general intelligence about the world we live in? I know the argument is that every president surrounds himself with great advisors, but if Stephen Hawking lectures a Rhino, the Rhino will not suddenly turn in a paper on Quasars and Black Holes.
Of course a simple written test might not satisfy America’s blood lust for the sensational. A phone call to Alex Trebek might do the trick. Aside from the quiz itself it would be very telling if your favorite candidate can’t follow the instructions enough to answer in the form of a question. And if they can’t handle the Jeopardy buzzer how will their finger perform “on the button?”
John McCain may have a harder time passing a driver’s test at his age than becoming President. Barack refused to take the 2008 Political Courage Test so a Presidential SAT is probably out of the question and if Hillary and Bill were to renew their vows, the blood test might be a little scary. All candidates have a built in aversion to answering questions, so until we invoke a Presidential SAT we will have to base our votes on what the candidates say and do on the campaign trail, never knowing if it’s because they hear it in an earpiece or see it on a teleprompter…or more terrifying, if what they say is really coming from their own brains.
The recent discussions about the current financial crisis and subsequent policies by the FED and treasury secretary Paulson have not addressed one of the main reasons for its debacle. GAAP - General Accepted Accounting Practices. We all know that for every debit there is a credit and vice-versa. What many people do not realize is that if I lend you money, that money shows up on my books as a future asset complete with interest, thus showing an immediate profit (at least on paper). I can now take that asset and borrow up to 90% against it. Now I can lend that money out to someone else and do it again and again and again. My ledger is legal and true, yet shows I have millions, even billions in assets that only virtually exist.
There are two things wrong with this approach. First there is the obvious problem of creating a false economy, which, by the way, it is. What is our economy really based on? The idea of money is desire. The ink is hope and the paper is trust. I know it says; “in God we trust”, but as long as we think a one dollar bill will still buy a set of spatulas at the 99 Cent Store, it is the paper we trust in. We’ll turn to God when it becomes the $2.99 Store and we still only have the one dollar…but I digress.
Then there is the fact that the individual did not authorize the lender to use his or her contract to repay a debt as collateral for a loan to benefit the lender. Of course none of this is disclosed, if it was, the lender would have to share the interest they get from the unauthorized loan with the original debtor for it is his promise to pay that makes the second loan possible. Add that to the law that disallows the public to deduct consumer interest, which led to more home equity loans in order to get around the interest loop hole and you can see the middle class playing the staring role in “The Incredible Shrinking Man”.
This practice is universal among all lending institutions including credit card companies such as Citibank, Discover, etc. Everything thing that is happening with the economy right now can be attributed to this practice, but as usual, every side-stepping law and regulation is being proposed without seeing the root of the evil.
The FED can raise and lower interest rates, Congress can throw billions at the problem and pile on rule upon rule, but until this fiat money is carefully looked at, these remedies are merely band aids on an amputated leg. We know the leg isn’t there, but we still keep reaching for it.
Note: The diagram was drawn by my friend Phil Stearns as I explain my theory to him for the first time.